Talk:Rich Merritt

Untitled comments
If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article.

"Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than trivial but may be less than exclusive.[1] "Reliable" means sources need editorial integrity to allow verifiable evaluation of notability, per the reliable source guideline. Sources may encompass published works in all forms and media. Availability of secondary sources covering the subject is a good test for notability.[2] "Sources,"[3] defined on Wikipedia as secondary sources, provide the most objective evidence of notability. The number and nature of reliable sources needed varies depending on the depth of coverage and quality of the sources. Multiple sources are generally preferred.[4] "Independent of the subject" excludes works produced by those affiliated with the subject including (but not limited to): self-publicity, advertising, self-published material by the subject, autobiographies, press releases, etc.[5] "Presumed" means that substantive coverage in reliable sources establishes a presumption, not a guarantee, of notability. Editors may reach a consensus that although a topic meets this criterion, it is not suitable for inclusion. For example, it may violate what Wikipedia is not.[6] A topic for which this criterion is deemed to have been met by consensus, is usually worthy of notice, and satisfies one of the criteria for a stand-alone article in the encyclopedia. Verifiable facts and content not supported by multiple independent sources may be appropriate for inclusion within another article.

RICH MERRITT has been the subject of a cover story in the New York Times magazine, the Advocate, the LA Times, the Times of London, The Weekly Standard and the Daily News. He and has been featured in over fifty other newspapers and magazines. He has published two books and has written several other articles about topics related to law, the military, lesbian and gay rights and religion. He has been interviewed for television and radio. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Westie Boy (talk • contribs)


 * I've removed the speedy deletion tag as this article obviously indicate that the subject has some notability - speedy deletion is intended to be used for obvious "vanity articles" for blatant non-entities; "Joe Bloggs is a schoolboy at Somewhere High School. Jane Doe fancies him" and so on. Whether the article would survive an AFD I'm not so sure. It would help if you could include more precide citations to the media coverage. Best, Iain99Balderdash and piffle 18:32, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Let me second Iain99. I think Merritt is notable if the citations are there; otherwise not.John Foxe (talk) 19:35, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Transfer credits from BJU
In the 1980s when Merritt was a student at least two BJU science profs had undergraduate degrees from BJU and PhDs from Clemson. Why did it take a senator to get Merritt's credits transferred?--John Foxe (talk) 22:33, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Even when it was unaccredited, BJU's credits were widely accepted, especially by other schools in South Carolina. What you are assuming is untrue, and your "general knowledge" is incorrect. Wikipedia demands proof.--John Foxe (talk) 14:19, 27 October 2008 (UTC)