Talk:Richard Barre/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 17:49, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * I madae a few minor copy-edits
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * All online references checkout, I assume GF for print sources.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * As broad as possible
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I found a number of redirects in the wikilinks which need addressing.
 * OK, I deem this worthy of GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:33, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Per WP:NOTBROKEN, there isn't any need to fix redirects, however. Ealdgyth - Talk 22:12, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, I just thought taht you might like to fix them. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:33, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I used to until I got chastised for fixing them ... Thanks for the review! Ealdgyth - Talk 22:37, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Per WP:NOTBROKEN, there isn't any need to fix redirects, however. Ealdgyth - Talk 22:12, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * OK, I just thought taht you might like to fix them. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:33, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I used to until I got chastised for fixing them ... Thanks for the review! Ealdgyth - Talk 22:37, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I used to until I got chastised for fixing them ... Thanks for the review! Ealdgyth - Talk 22:37, 27 December 2009 (UTC)