Talk:Richard Dawkins/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * This well written and follows the Wikipedia MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * I added two requested citations. This article is well referenced to reliable sources and I can find no evidence of OR
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I have no hesitation in confirming that this article meets the Good Article criteria. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:14, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * I have no hesitation in confirming that this article meets the Good Article criteria. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:14, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I have no hesitation in confirming that this article meets the Good Article criteria. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:14, 14 August 2009 (UTC)