Talk:Richard Field (printer)

Bias
This article is deeply biased and unprofessional. I will not enter into an edit war with Mr. Barlowe, whose unprofessional tactics are exemplified in many Wikipedia discussions. The purpose of this note is to document the need for major revisions to the article. There is no evidence that the author "William Shakespeare" ever knew Richard Field, and the article's agenda -- which is to create an association out of largely imaginary "evidence" -- needs to be corrected. --98.218.42.191 (talk) 17:30, 17 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Carry on living in your fantasy world. It is biassed towards reality, as we all should be. In fact it says exactly what the professionals in scholarship of the period say. So it would be "unprofessional" to do otherwise. Paul B (talk) 17:34, 17 October 2011 (UTC)