Talk:Richard Glücks

In Popular Culture
Not sure it is appropriate to grant any form of glorification through identifying Glücks as a "possible" fictional character in a famous novel. This man was a criminal, pure and simple. Since the article section on his fictional depiction fails to cite the source of origin and appears to be mythologized conjecture - I advocate for the section to be REMOVED altogether. Moreover, even if the content does appear to be true and somebody substantiates it, this constitutes nothing more than a deserved footnote and the information should be moved into the Wiki-article on the novel. --Obenritter (talk) 19:16, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Its been uncited for a long time, since 2008. It was tagged more recently, with no improvement. Frankly it is trivia, to say the least. Thanks, for bringing it up. I had actually taken this article off my watch list (have to pare it down sometime), so I am glad you pinged me. Kierzek (talk) 20:09, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Roger that - I am removing it accordingly. You probably noticed I did some editing of this article to improve its academic quality.--Obenritter (talk) 20:12, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Nevermind - you took it to task. :-) --Obenritter (talk) 20:13, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

New pics
I have added new images of two key characters mentioned in the article, Hoess and Pohl, as well as a photo of the Zyklon B pellets used for murdering victims. 86.189.231.93 (talk) 19:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Rv per WP:BRD the photos of Hoess and Pohl as they are not an improvement, nor needed. They are not of the subject of this bio article. I left the photo of Zyklon B as that one is relevant. Kierzek (talk) 20:00, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Hoess and Pohl are highly relevant because they were so closely involved with the Holocaust, and they clearly improve the article which is currently devoid of illustrative information. I note that there is also much information on key Holocaust figures missing but present on the German edition.  W should aim to keep up-to-date with current research, especially on the connections with action T4. 86.189.231.93 (talk) 20:29, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I added two relevant photos. Kierzek (talk) 20:53, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:07, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Richard Glücks.jpg

Fernando rosales
Se puede ver a Richard glucks en YouTube en un vídeo en el interrogatorio a Rudolf hoss en su juicio de nuremberg 200.84.37.8 (talk) 19:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC)