Talk:Richard Kaner

Notability

 * He is
 * board of directors for California NanoSystems Institute
 * Southern California Section of the American Chemical Society Tolman Medal
 * adjunct professor at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology


 * notability of the things he is
 * He member of a institute board, this is for sure not enough to get notable
 * A medal of a regional Chemical Society is also lacking the power to make him notable
 * adjunct professor is not notable only people holding a named chair or similar professorships qualify.

--Stone (talk) 09:25, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Recent links:


 * https://www.chemistry.ucla.edu/news/ucla-energy-incubator-produces-graphene-expands-surface-area-storage-within-range-theoretical
 * https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/video/supercharged-supercapacitors/
 * https://www.chemistry.ucla.edu/news/kaner-group-research-graphene-among-top-10-most-cited-research-articles-prestigious-science

According to Google Scholar metrics the article entitled "Laser Scribing of High Performance and Flexible Graphene-Based Electrochemical capacitors" by El-Kady, Veronica Strong, Sergey Dubin and Kaner published in Science in March 2012 is ranked as the 10th most cited research paper in the journal in the last five years. As of February 2018, the article has already exceeded 2000 citations.

It strikes me as highly unlikely that this guy is not notable. &mdash; MaxEnt 14:54, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I agree. With a dozen four-digit-citation papers (fewer three-digit-citation papers would be enough) he very easily passes WP:PROF. I'm untagging this article. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:51, 1 August 2020 (UTC)