Talk:Richard Neal

William C. Sullivan link
I'm pretty sure that's to a different person, unless he went from getting thrown out by J. Edgar Hoover to mayor of Spfld. in a couple of years' span. Someone please confirm and change the link. Cheers, PhilipR 07:32, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

I did my best. --Tbowen86 02:17, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Page organization
Usually in the politicians' pages, the U.S. House is organized from elections to tenure to committee assignments. The personal life and electoral history is typically toward the bottom of the page.--Jerzeykydd (talk) 18:08, 7 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, my version had that same order, aside from "Committee assignments". The stuff you listed here, for the most part, isn't what you changed.


 * Your heading structure is pedantic and doesn't reflect the content of the page. You put his successfully adopted banking reform amendment at the bottom under "Influence and power", instead of at the top under "Economy", do you not see that as a bizarre structure? Mid-tier congressmen almost never get anything adopted, so any significant legislation that he passed should be at the top of the "House career" section, not at the bottom. His long-standing work on the AMT is now the sixth paragraph of his House career. And what's on top? His inconsequential reputation as an Irish-American; his generic "moderate Democrat" votes on the Iraq War and abortion. This is not ordered like a biography; it's written like an "On The Issues" voters' guide. I don't like it. Those "stance" issues should go last because they're not Wikipedia's priority. His accomplishments and his career focus should be the focus of the article. That's the economy and the budget.


 * I can appreciate that readers want a convenient table to list his (current) committee seats; that's why I included one. That does not explain why the sections that actually talk at length about his committee work should be isolated from the rest of his tenure. His committee seats are not trivia; they are the entire basis of a legislator's career. They need to be written into the article, as any reasonable biography would do.


 * The other changes are less important, but honestly, I don't know why you have more of a say in deciding them than I do. "Mayor of Springfield" really doesn't need its own heading, being one paragraph, for example. It's totally fine to put it under "Early political career". "Early life, education, and early political careeer" is an ungodly heading. Have you ever read an encyclopedia? They just don't have headings like that. "KISS" applies here.


 * Sorting "Domestic policy" and "Foreign policy" under "Tenure" is unnatural; the master heading implies that it's about his tenure. It's just superfluous.


 * This GA should not be wrenched into the format of the terrible legislator stubs. If anything, it should be the other way around. I put a reasonable amount of time when I wrote the article into figuring this stuff out, so I should get some say. I'm certainly not claiming ownership of anything, and I'm not offended by people editing it, but just as a reader I can't endorse anything you did do this article. —Designate (talk) 02:38, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Richard Neal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071229121856/http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/110/house/party-voters/ to http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/110/house/party-voters/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 09:33, 12 May 2017 (UTC)