Talk:Richard Neville, 16th Earl of Warwick/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have the full review up soon. Dana boomer (talk) 16:14, 4 November 2008 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

I have completed everything except for a review of the prose, which I will complete after I go get lunch :) So far, the article is looking great.  I should have the review finished by mid-afternoon.  Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 16:47, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I have now finished the review of the article, and as I have found no issues, I am promoting it to GA status. This is a wonderful article, very well written.  Nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 18:10, 4 November 2008 (UTC)