Talk:Richard Pace

Requested move 7 September 2020

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. --  JHunterJ (talk) 11:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

– No indication that the 500-year-old activities of the diplomat hold sufficient historical import for primary status. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 07:24, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Richard Pace → Richard Pace (diplomat)
 * Richard Pace (disambiguation) → Richard Pace
 * Oppose. Although the settler's article is longer, the diplomat does appear to have the most historical significance by quite a long way. The only other two real people with articles were really notable to their local area only, whereas the diplomat was a figure of national and international importance. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:51, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Oppose Due to lack of a rationale provided in the nomination. There is no such thing as "sufficient historical import for primary status," as primary topics are determined relative to other subjects of the same name and not some arbitrary bar of historical importance.--Yaksar (let's chat) 19:05, 10 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.