Talk:Richard Walter (psychologist)

Untitled
Richard Walter is one of the creators of modern criminal profiling and a co-founder of the Vidocq Society.

Danny Devito's production company has optioned a movie about Richard and the Vidocq Society http://www.usatoday.com/careers/dream/2001-march-forensic-movie.htm Best-selling author Mike Capuzzo was given a multi-million dollar advance to write about Richard and the Vidocq Society "In the Arms of Angels":  http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA256951.html?pubdate=11%2F4%2F2002&display=archive

Arbitration Committee
Please direct all discussion regarding controversial material to the Arbitration Committee. If you do not know the address use "email this user" to members of the committee. Fred Bauder 00:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * E-mail may be sent to any active arbitrator with the request that it be forwarded to the Arbitration Committee mailing list. Editors are requested not to continue posting regarding their disputes concerning this article all over the site as has been occurring; this is not necessary or productive. Newyorkbrad 02:46, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Please also see my talk page, where much of this discussion has taken plance (and also the WP:LE main talk page too) SGGH 08:41, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

After an email raising further concerns from Bturvey, I have posted this article at the BLP admin noticeboard here SGGH 19:26, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Protected edit request
Please remove Category:Criminology topics per Categories for discussion/Log/2007 March 17. Thanks! Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:54, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


 * EditProtected done. CMummert · talk 17:40, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Protected edit request
Sources for the section: Notable Cases

John List Case

Scott Dunn Case

Hudson, Wisconsin Case

15:04, 15 April 2007 (UTC) buzzle45

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:41, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Should this hagiography be revised to include some actual facts?
"[A]nyone with an internet connection should know he is a fraud."

This rather reverent, indeed worshipful, bio may need revision, to include the claims in this recent article (from a definitely RS) describing Walter as a "fraud":

'''The Case of the Fake Sherlock: Richard Walter was hailed as a genius criminal profiler. How did he get away with his fraud for so long?'''

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/richard-walter-criminal-profiler-fraud.html 24.186.244.240 (talk) 18:14, 11 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I looked over a handful of the sources.
 * Source 1, Criminal profiling: an introduction to behavioral evidence analysis, is entirely about Walter's ethical lapses. It certainly does nothing to bolster the claims made in the introduction.
 * Source 2 and 7 (the same source repeated twice), The Casebook of Forensic Detection, is inaccurate. It describes a Dr. Richard Walter, but Walter holds no doctorate, medical degree, or similar qualification.
 * Source 5 purports to show that "Walter was the first to develop a matrix as a tool of investigation using pre-crime, crime and post-crime behaviors to help develop suspects." This paper was written in part by Walter himself so I would not rely on it to show his primacy, but even taking it at face value it does not seem to support the claims in the article. The paper extends an existing framework for classifying rapists to include sexual murders, hardly possible if Walter was the first to develop such a tool. Also, the meaning of the term "matrix" in this context is not explained. I see no mention of the word "matrix" in the paper and the paper seemingly does not rely on matrices in the mathematical sense (as a means of defining linear transformations.)
 * The link for Source 8 is dead and is not available on archive.org (as far as I can tell), but I found what purports to be a copy.
 * https://www.bishop-accountability.org/news2012/01_02/2012_02_05_Stohlberg_DoubleMurder.htm
 * I see mention of Richard Walter's involvement. I would prefer, of course, to find an archive of the Star-Observer's website.
 * The sources are generally low-quality and do not support (or even directly contradict) the claims in the article. 32.209.42.137 (talk) 13:45, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Be more bold. Don't wait for other people to edit this article for you, because more often than not nobody will. If you see a relevant detail that merits being added here, do you can do so as soon as you want. Also, consider taking off the "factual accuracy" tag when you are done editing the article, though the citation needed tags may stay. 🔥 22spears 🔥 12:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)