Talk:Richard Wetz

GA Review
This is a well-written article, it just needs more citations in the Biography, Style, and Reception sections (although Style is of least importance) before it can be passed. The symphonies he is best known for should also be named in the lead. So, for now this will be on hold. --~ Joe  Jklin  (  T   C  )  02:38, 5 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Here's a list that might help with improvements --~ Joe  Jklin  (  T   C  )  02:49, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * 1) It is stable.
 * 2) It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * 1) Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * a Pass/Fail:


 * Going to try to find an audio clip, somewhere, and perhaps some links to currently available works without looking like I'm spamming. Hm. ~Kylu ( u | t )  02:20, 8 September 2007 (UTC)\


 * GA Failed. Not enough improvement were made in the seven days in order to pass it. This article still needs more reliable citations and could use a good image or two.  You can see my comments above for further improvements~  Joe  Jklin  (  T   C  )  03:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Composer project review
I've reviewed this article as part of the WikiProject Composers review of its B-class articles. This article is fairly high quality; it requires a few things to achieve an A rating; and a few (different) things, noted in the GA review above, to merit GA consideration. My detailed review is on the comments page; questions or comments can be left here or on my talk page.  Magic ♪piano 21:14, 28 November 2008 (UTC)


 * One note that should probably go, despite whatever the (German) source says about him being one of "the great" late German Romantics. An almost unknown composer cannot be one of the "greats" - his music had no influence because it was virtually unheard, and he had little to no influence on other composers - and per the article itself, appeared to be very derivative of Bruckner - the author sounds like he is too attached to Wetz as a personal favorite, and is making claims that cannot be justified.  Until CPO began issuing his music on compact disc at the turn of the 21st century, who had really heard of him? The New Grove, for instance, makes no such claims on his stature. 98.67.186.31 (talk) 00:31, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 04:24, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Richard Wetz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070515064138/http://www.erfurt.de/ef/de/entdecken/geschichte/pers/03976.shtml to http://www.erfurt.de/ef/de/entdecken/geschichte/pers/03976.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:04, 5 January 2018 (UTC)