Talk:Richard Worley (police officer)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Vanderwaalforces (talk · contribs) 18:12, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

I will review this. Good luck to us in advance. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:12, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

1a—prose
I fixed parts needing attention. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:05, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

1b—MOS

 * Lead: The lead can be reworked, can you expand it so that it summarises main points from the body? --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:26, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Layout:
 * Words to watch: Throughout the article, it's Richard J. Worley, what is the J. initial? Please add in full if possible or remove entirely. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:47, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
 * The Police career section appears to be close paraphrasing of www.baltimorepolice.org/about/police-commissioner. It needs to be rewritten. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:53, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
 * His, DOB is also not clear, is there no source confirming his exact date of birth? Instead of saying 1964 or 1965. Otherwise, let's use circa by implementing the template.
 * Something like this would make sense: Richard Worley (c. 1965) is an American police officer... then on the subsequent occurence, you could just use c. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:26, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

2a—reference section
Everything fine. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:39, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

2b—reliable sources
Sources are reliable and and well cited. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:39, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

2c—OR
No original research detected. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:39, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

2d—copyvio and plagiarism
No detection of plagiarism/copyvio. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:38, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

3a—major aspects
This article is generally not broad in it's coverage. Because this is a BLP, even though some major aspects are covered. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:26, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

3b—focused
This is good to go. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:27, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

4—NPOV
This is good to go. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:06, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

5—Stable
No recent edit/move wars, so this is okay. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:45, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

6a and b—appropriate use of images with suitable captions
Image on infobox (licensed in cc-by-2.0) was extracted from another image which was licensed under the terms of cc-by-2.0. Also, image is relevant because it is an image of Richard Worley. So this is okay. --Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:43, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

7—Overall

 * Pass/Fail:
 * While there's an issue with the coverage which is the only criteria not met here, I am happy to give this article a quick pass. Congratulations!