Talk:Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia

= Review =

Untitled
Great start ! -Reagle (talk) 16:38, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Excellent work! I made two small tweaks to the prose. I also removed the stub template but left the unreviewed template in hopes someone else will have a look. In the lead, does it make sense to go beyond the summary of issues and briefly state what the consequence was? Also, what categories might you include your article in? Categories and projects might help you connect with others who will be willing to review this. -Reagle (talk) 14:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

= Peer Review = I think you did an amazing job with creating this article and providing so much in-depth information while maintaining a neutral point of view. The article is very clear and engaging and I think you did a great job with incorporating media into your article and linking to other Wikipedia articles (branches in and out). The start of the article identifies why the topic is significant without revealing too much. I have a suggestion for the start, do you think it would be a good idea to end the beginning at ..."The Fourteenth Amendment to the United States" and shift the next few sentences to the start of the Background section? Overall, I think you did a great job. Rijahmazhar (talk) 19:33, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kimmecca. Peer reviewers: Rijahmazhar, Derryck1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:07, 18 January 2022 (UTC)