Talk:Ricky Taylor

Near impossible to understand
The text of this article is almost completely unreadable. This is barely in English. If English is your second language and you don't have a firm grasp of it, how is this helpful to English Wikipedia? What good is an article of gibberish? The359 ( Talk ) 08:29, 31 January 2014 (UTC)


 * I would suggest you read WP:AGF and WP:CIVIL. Granted the article needs help and work, but making comments like the one above serves no constructive purpose.  Additionally, the article is not close to gibberish, but rather needs a close eye to correct the issues.  Rather than making grossly inaccurate comments, I would suggest you use the time to help the article rather than biting the newbie.   red dog six  (talk) 16:41, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm well aware of both policies. It serves constructive purpose by telling someone that their contributions may be more harmful than they are helpful.  How are any of my comments inaccurate?  I'll ask again, what good is broken English on an English Wikipedia?  Should I have to follow all of his edits around, which I already appear to have to do looking at his edit history, just to fix all the articles that have been hacked at?  The359  ( Talk ) 18:17, 31 January 2014 (UTC)