Talk:Rider Pt. 2

Uniform and reaction
Any plans to reference the backlash to the defamation of the Marine Corps uniforms that occurred in this video? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.88.35.94 (talk) 01:25, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Rider Pt. 1?
Whats Rider Pt. 1 ? --Piazzajordan2 17:30, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Move
It's Rider Pt. 2! it has a space between the dot and 2! u can clearly see it on the single cover! don't move the page to Rider Pt.2!-SCB &#39;92 (talk) 19:22, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose since I don't see any space on the cover. Big T.V. Fan (talk) 19:27, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


 * You can clearly see the space on the single cover if you enlarge it, just look at it, how can u not see it? the dot and 2 is spaced apart -SCB &#39;92 (talk) 19:38, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't see a space. Big T.V. Fan (talk) 20:48, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I really don't think that it matters too much. --  ¤ The-G-Unit-฿oss ¤   21:06, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Move I clearly see the space, and it should be there even if omitted. gidonb (talk) 23:21, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

exactly!-SCB &#39;92 (talk) 12:15, 13 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Move SCB &#39;92 (talk) 13:39, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Where's the refs?
Could I see some references please? Currently, there's only one and it links to YouTube, which is certainly no reliable source. Just citing the album cover itself ought to be enough for much of the basic information. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 23:56, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Why was this moved?
"Pt." is not a proper noun,therefore,the move was incorrect. XxJoshuaxX (talk) 14:13, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
 * There does not appear to be a "Rider, part 1", therefore it should be assumed that the title is literally "Rider Pt. 2", rather than "Rider, part 2". Normally we leave short words uncapitalized, though lower-case "p" doesn't really look right.  How is it rendered on the tracklisting on the album sleeve?  217.36.107.9 (talk) 10:41, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Actually,there is a Rider pt. 1. Look here. XxJoshuaxX (talk) 14:49, 24 July 2008 (UTC)