Talk:Ridgefield, Connecticut/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Magic ♪piano 15:12, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

This article quick-fails. According to WP:RGA, items 1 and 2, the article, while it contains a decent-looking list of sources, does not cite sources for many of its statistics, and contains several statements (which I will tag) that are sufficiently surprising to require citation. I will also note that GAs these days tend to require citation of all but the least controversial facts; the article should contain inline citations for each paragraph at a minimum; this article has few such citations. It is also not normal in Good Articles that external links be contained within the text (as they are for a number of the town's organizations); these should be the "External links" section. Lastly, the works in the references section should contain more full bibliographic information, including at a minimum publisher, location, and ISBN (for works that have them) or OCLC numbers (for older works that do not have ISBNs).

--  Magic ♪piano 15:12, 7 September 2010 (UTC)