Talk:Rikku/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk · contribs) 22:58, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

I'm driving by and just saw something: one of the sentences is unsourced. While the voiceover work was being done, the character had motion capture performed by Miyuki Shimizu for Final Fantasy X and by  Natsuho Matsuda for Final Fantasy X-2. I wonder if there's a reference for that. « I ias! : post□ :,,.I » 02:22, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * As mentioned above, there's one sentence at the end of "Concept and Creation" section, the final sentence is not verified.
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Almost there. Same thing with the Terra Branford article, defininitely invest in choosing a consistent date format for refs.Blue Pumpkin Pie Chat Contribs 15:00, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok I think I got them all! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:05, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Now all that is left is the last sentence of Concept and Creation to be sourced, and i'll pass it.Blue Pumpkin Pie Chat Contribs 17:41, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Good catch, unfortunately I have looked several times and have found no source for that, so I have removed it until a source is found. Now I think it’s done :) Judgesurreal777 (talk) 17:54, 17 June 2020 (UTC)