Talk:Riley's Lock/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tim riley (talk · contribs) 20:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

I peer reviewed this article some weeks ago and found nothing much to quibble about. I suppose in the interests of full disclosure I should add that to the best of my knowledge I am no connection with the Riley of Riley's Lock, and, that done, I am pleased to promote this article, which seems to me to meet all the GA criteria:  Tim riley  talk   20:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

Overall summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Thank you so much! TwoScars (talk) 18:48, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Thank you so much! TwoScars (talk) 18:48, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Thank you so much! TwoScars (talk) 18:48, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much! TwoScars (talk) 18:48, 10 October 2021 (UTC)