Talk:Ring a Ring o' Roses/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dwaipayanc (talk · contribs) 22:48, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

It is a very interesting and entertaining article. Some minor observation, before we say this is a GA, are as follows:
 * In Early attestation section, "The rhyme must already have been widely distributed" sounds editorialized, and needs a citation.
 * Shropshire, Lancashire: needs wikilink.
 * "In 1892, Alice Gomme could give twelve versions" I think a small descriptor of Gomem is needed here. Who was Gomme?
 * " Peter and Iona Opie remarked" A small descriptor would be nice.
 * "The explanation appeared very late" probably needs re-wording. It is vague, unless you give approximate date in this sentence (the approx date has been mentioned earlier, but here also would be ok). Or else, some other re-wording?
 * "The following are the seven earliest reports known to us in Britain&nbsp... In only four of these recordings is sneezing a feature" nbsp formatting to be fixed.
 * "Branle, calandre, La Fille d'Alexandre, La pêche bien mûre, Le rosier tout fleuri, Coucou toupi – En disant 'coucou toupi', tous les enfants quie forment la ronde, s'accroupissent"" what does this mean in English?--Dwaipayan (talk) 22:48, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for these. I think I have fixed the issues. Is there anything else that needs changing?--  SabreBD  (talk) 21:17, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't think any other major changes are needed. I will be back soon to complete the ga assessment.--Dwaipayan (talk) 02:57, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Great, thanks.--  SabreBD  (talk) 19:18, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
 * In my opinion, this article meets GA criteria.--Dwaipayan (talk) 17:24, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Many thanks Dwaipayan. Much appreciated.--  SabreBD  (talk) 17:45, 26 May 2013 (UTC)