Talk:Ring learning with errors

Why quantum safe?
Is there a proof of some kind as to why RLWE is quantum-safe - or is that question nonsensical? (Meaning, "thought quantum-safe given what current quantum circuits can do.") Jimw338 (talk) 23:51, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Yes, there is a proof. "Kind-off". See NP-hard problems. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.120.92.37 (talk) 09:19, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Quotiens are not subrings
The statement: "The sub-ring is typically the finite quotient (factor) ring formed by reducing all of the polynomials in {\textstyle \mathbf {F} _{q}[x]} {\textstyle \mathbf {F} _{q}[x]} modulo an irreducible polynomial {\textstyle \Phi (x)} {\textstyle \Phi (x)}" does not make sense as quotient rings are not subrings. They might be represented by a subring, but there is a mathematical distinction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.120.92.37 (talk) 09:15, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Irreducible polynomial
The cyclotomic polynomial $$\Phi(x)$$ is irreducible over $$\Q$$. The article makes it sound it like we need to pick an irreducible polynomial over $$\Z_q$$, which it may not be (nor do we need it to be). 2604:5500:C29D:FF01:2059:2215:8DE:21D1 (talk) 00:25, 20 September 2023 (UTC)