Talk:Ring of Gullion

Geology
Serious doubts about the accuracy of the geology in the article could be wrong but it doesn't make a great deal of sense. ClimberDave 14:44, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

I have to agree with Climber Dave, the geology in this article is wholly inaccurate, and should be removed or changed. Fossiliferous 20:44, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Merge?
Having had a quick search, I would suggest that the best option here would be to merge this article with the stub Slieve Gullion, which is about the same area and is much more accurate (although I'd question some of it). In fact I'd go as far as to say, expand Slieve Gullion, adding a section on its geological formation and delete this article. But that's just me.... Fossiliferous 21:20, 1 October 2007 (UTC)