Talk:Ringerike Line/GA1

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:Ringeriksbanen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I will be reviewing this article. Canadakid2 (talk) 00:03, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Review by User:Lpangelrob

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * Thank your for the review. All matters should have been seen to now. Arsenikk (talk)  00:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


 * I made a couple further edits, but now it looks good. Thanks! &mdash; Rob (  talk  ) 03:44, 4 July 2008 (UTC)