Talk:Rio Abiseo National Park

wrong category?
I don't think a national park (particularly one that is primarily a nature reserve) should be categorized in the Archaeological sites in Peru category. Sure, there are archaeological sites within the park, but the parks themselves are primarily parks, not archaeological sites. If nobody has objections I will be removing the archaeological site category from this page as well as Huascarán National Park for the same reason. Gsd97jks 14:00, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Rio Abiseo National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111014034322/http://gis.wwfus.org/wildfinder/ to http://gis.wwfus.org/wildfinder/
 * Added tag to http://www.wcmc.org.uk/protected_areas/data/wh/rioabise.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120330235333/http://anthropology.columbusstate.edu/Pajaten.htm to http://anthropology.columbusstate.edu/Pajaten.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:28, 13 January 2018 (UTC)