Talk:Rio Grande rift

Untitled
THIS IS ONE BEAUTIFULLY WRITTEN ARTICLE: THANK YOU Tdw1203 (talk) 23:41, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rio Grande rift. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051220215216/http://home.att.net/~sgeoveatch/rio_grande_rift.htm to http://home.att.net/~sgeoveatch/rio_grande_rift.htm
 * Added tag to http://igpphelp.ucsd.edu/~fialko/Assets/PDF/fialkoGRL01b.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:24, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Capitalization
According to this style guide: https://rmag.memberclicks.net/assets/MountainGeologist/Author%20Style%20Guide_Download_2016.pdf. The term "Rio Grande Rift" is given as a specific example of a proper name that should be fully capitalized. If this is the case, should we not rename this article to reflect the correct capitalization style? Kent G. Budge (talk) 14:55, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
 * That's a "specialist" style guide. General publications usually do not cap it. Dicklyon (talk) 16:52, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The Rio Grande Rift is a specialist concept. Kent G. Budge (talk) 01:34, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * What does that even mean? Dicklyon (talk) 06:09, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

class activity
Each fact is referenced by a reliable source. I also do not think that this article is biased. It shares factual evidence with its readers rather than persuading them to pick a side or the author giving their opinion. --Brunobella (talk) 18:30, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Class Activity: Rio Grande Rift
Everything in the article is appropriately referenced down below in the references section. Nothing is out of place or stated without being correctly cited. The article is also very neutral and has no bias towards one side, given that it is only stating facts about the Rio Grande rift.Sndiego1501 (talk) 18:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Class activity
Each fact in this article is referenced with an appropriate and reliable reference. This is proven in the references section below the article. The article is neutral since it simply gives facts about the Rio Grande Rift without any contradictions and/or opinions. Hornets 2001 (talk) 18:47, 22 October 2020 (UTC)