Talk:Risk management tools

?
References added; remove reference critique?

Merging, redirecting is fine, however I believe it will confuse rather than assist. Merging with Risk Management is the most logically sound, but would detract from that article, in my opinion.GESICC (talk) 09:39, 3 September 2010 (UTC)GESICC

Removing Notability; references, etc. provided.GESICC (talk) 06:13, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

I invented RiskAoA, but currently have no ties, but pride, to the program. It was developed at Air Force Research Labs, is one of it's crowing accomplishments of 2006, is an approved tool for the US Government and is now managed by Air Force Material Command. All conflict of interests have been removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GESICC (talk • contribs) 19:18, 16 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you for disclosing your previous connection to the topic. I have moved the template to the top of the article, where it is usually placed as info. I have also removed all entries that lacked independent reliable sources or a stand-alone Wikipedia article to establish their significance or "notability", as Wikipedia uses the term. GermanJoe (talk) 23:37, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

System-level tools ? Two or three types of risk tools?
The lead briefly mentioned this type of tools, but previous details about this aspect lacked independent sources and had already been removed by other editors in the past. I have removed the stray lead mention accordingly. But if "system-level tools" are indeed a significant and distinct class of risk management tools, this fact needs 1) an independent expert source to establish its significance (involved tool developers advocating their own new technique do not count as "independent") and 2) a short explanation in the main text with a few more details. GermanJoe (talk) 00:45, 14 November 2018 (UTC)