Talk:Ristorante Machiavelli/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 08:53, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi, I'll be reviewing this GAN as part of the ongoing GAN backlog drive. --Vacant0 (talk) 08:53, 19 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 13:29, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Initial comments

 * It is possible that there is copyright violation in the article. Earwig's Copyvio Detector has reported 70% in similarity. Will analyse this in depth later in the review. False positive. Earwig again picked up quotes which are properly used in the article.
 * 👍 --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:11, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * There are no cleanup banners, such as those listed at WP:QF, in the article.
 * 👍 --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:11, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The article is stable. There has not been any edit warring in the recent period.
 * 👍 --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:11, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * No previous GA reviews. Went through AfD recently.
 * 👍 --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 14:11, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

General comments

 * Prose, spelling, and grammar checking.
 * No problems were found in the lede.
 * 👍 --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:38, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * What about moving Ristorante Machiavelli's menu has changed little in three decades. to the Menu section?
 * Not entirely opposed, but I see this more as an operational decision which adds historical context. I'll relocate the text if you feel strongly. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:36, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I could see that too... Okay, let's keep it there actually. Vacant0 (talk) 21:40, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Sure, thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:43, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * What about moving In 2022, the Booker Building was sold to the private San Francisco-based company Prado Group. to the Description section?
 * To me, this is a statement about the ownership of the building, not the restaurant specifically. While I think this is relevant context for the History section, I don't think most people would describe the restaurant based on the owners of the building in which it is housed. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:37, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * No problems were found in the rest of the article.
 * 👍 --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:38, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Checking whether the article complies with MOS.
 * Good job on those alt texts!
 * 👍 --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:38, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The article complies with the MOS:LEDE, MOS:LAYOUT, and MOS:WTW guidelines. There is no fiction and embedded lists within the article, so I am skipping MOS:WAF and MOS:EMBED.
 * 👍 --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:41, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Checking refs, verifiability, and whether there is original research.
 * References section with a template is present in the article.
 * No referencing issues.
 * 👍 --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:38, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Listed references are reliable, they are mostly news websites.
 * Ref 21 is region blocked so I'll AGF on it.
 * Ref 25 cannot be loaded for some reason. It's archived, ignore this.
 * 👍 --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:44, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Spotchecked Ref 1, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 14, 16, 18, 24, 26, 29, 33, 36, 41–all verify the cited content. AGF on other citations.
 * 👍 --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:44, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Checking potential copyright violations.
 * False positive. The quotes in the article were picked up and that is why the percentage is so high.
 * 👍 --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:44, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Checking whether the article is broad in its coverage.
 * Do we know why Ristorante Machiavelli experienced a staffing shortage in 2021, is this due to COVID?
 * I think we could assume, especially given some of the commentary in the source about the pandemic, but since COVID-19 is not specifically mentioned w/r/t Ristorante Machiavelli, I think we should avoid the assumption. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:41, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * What are the occupations of those listed in the Restaurant guides and review websites section?
 * I've noted which outlets they write for, but I do not think we should assign them any specific occupation. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:43, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The article stays focused on the topic. The article has been vastly improved since the AfD nomination.
 * 👍 --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:42, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Checking whether the article is presented from an NPOV standpoint.
 * The article meets the criteria and is written in encyclopedic language.
 * 👍 --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:42, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Checking whether the article is stable.
 * As noted in the initial comments, there has not been any edit warring in the recent period.
 * 👍 --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:42, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Checking images.
 * All looks good, images are yours and they are properly licensed.
 * 👍 --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:42, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Final comments
Luckily enough,, there is not much to fix. I'll leave the article on hold for a week and promote it once the issues get addressed. Cheers, --Vacant0 (talk) 21:37, 19 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for reviewing! Please let me know if any concerns remain. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:45, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree with all your comments above; if there is no information on why it experienced a staffing shortage in 2021 it should be kept as it is in the article. Promoting this to GA then.
 * P.S. this kind of a GAN is interesting to read. Vacant0 (talk) 21:49, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I've also nominated Bipartisan Cafe, if you're interested in a similar entry. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:50, 19 August 2023 (UTC)