Talk:Rivelin Rocks

Location
The article apparently contradicts itself. In the first section it claims the rocks are on private property. In the second section it claims the rocks are within the bounds of a National Park.

They could fall across a boundary, but the article is not specific enough to be clear. 82.68.152.186


 * Apologies if I'm being presumptious, but it sounds like you're thinking of national parks in the USA sense, where I believe they are publicly owned and preserved as wilderness. In the UK version of national parks, plenty of land is privately owned. They are not preserved as human-free wilderness areas, but as regular countryside (with private land, agriculture, buildings, small settlements, even light industry) with added protection to prevent over-development. Does this answer your question? --VinceBowdren 15:38, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Formatting
Any idea what is wrong with the formatting on this document - the edit links are at the end. I have had a look but cannot spot an obvious issue (the refs are all okay). RobChafer 14:05, 20 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I think they got pushed around when you have pictures on the right-hand side of the page, which take up the position the edit link would normally go. --VinceBowdren 17:05, 21 October 2007 (UTC)