Talk:River Alde

Merger proposal
It's been proposed, after a bit of discussion on Cmglee's talk page, that the River Ore article be merged with River Alde. Essentially it seems like the two rivers are one and the same and it would allow some rationalisation of pages around the river and it's estuary - there's an SSSI page and at least one nature reserve page involved as well as the Ness. Thoughts? Blue Square Thing (talk) 20:32, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

✅ Support for Blue Square Thing's reasons above. I'd also suggest having a map showing the range of the 2 rivers. cm&#610;&#671;ee&#2927;&#8202;&#865;&#176;&#160;&#814;&#1583;&#8202;&#865;&#176;&#8201;&#2669; 22:04, 24 January 2013 (UTC)


 * ✅! cm&#610;&#671;ee&#2927;&#8202;&#865;&#176;&#160;&#814;&#1583;&#8202;&#865;&#176;&#8201;&#2669; 21:30, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * uh, not quite... you didn't place the redirect on the River Ore article that would redirect people to this article instead. I've done it for you now. ;-) Richard3120 (talk) 23:51, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I had updated the River Ore article but not the River Ore, Suffolk one. cm&#610;&#671;ee&#9094;&#964;a&#671;&#954; 00:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

tributary
I suppose that in the box the 'tributary river Ore' is a misprint of 'tributary river Butley' pietro151.29.189.70 (talk) 05:38, 8 April 2020 (UTC)