Talk:River Cherwell

Untitled
Hi.

This article seemed a little too long on its own... I hope the subsections are okay... if anyone wants to rename them (etc!) feel free to jump in right away!--NeilTarrant 21:24, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * Fine by me.. I did go on rather! But you typed 'Shipman' instead of Shipton... well, the former has been in the news this week! Incidentally, can someone explain why the photo was removed? Andy F 02:32, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Perhaps somebody should add something about the great flood of 1998. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.225.1.161 (talk) 16:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

ref parameters
@Redrose64 Re your admonition please be careful how you fill in ref params: I use Provelt. I think there are way more important lapses to be corrected on this WP, for example the glaring LACK of sources on this page, dont you think ? Wuerzele (talk) 19:07, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * So there aren't enough sources - that doesn't give you an excuse to add malformed refs, as you did in . Why on earth would you think that MagazineSmithsonian are sensible parameters? -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 22:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Redrose64 "an excuse to add malformed refs"? Excuse me, Provelt did it. Adding a source needed  flag is what anyone SHOULD do here. Now Thank you for your time and have a good day, esp finding sources, if you are so concerned about improving WP.--Wuerzele (talk) 19:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
 * As shown at User scripts, you take full responsibility for any action you perform using any user script. So please don't blame ProveIt. If there is a bug with ProveIt, it may be reported at Wikipedia talk:ProveIt. -- Red rose64 &#x1f339; (talk) 19:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC)