Talk:River Maun

Assessment
I have assessed the article against the criteria for B-class. Since it meets these criteria, I am rating it as B-class. Bob1960evens (talk) 15:34, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Suitably referenced, with inline citations
 * Reasonable coverage - no obvious omissions or inaccuracies
 * Defined structure, with adequate lead
 * Reasonably well written for grammar and flow
 * Supporting materials - Infobox, map, images, POI table
 * Appropriately understandable

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on River Maun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110410092659/http://www.ashfield-dc.gov.uk/ccm/navigation/leisure-and-culture/tourism-and-travel/king-s-mill-reservoir/ to http://www.ashfield-dc.gov.uk/ccm/navigation/leisure-and-culture/tourism-and-travel/king-s-mill-reservoir/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:52, 22 January 2018 (UTC)