Talk:Rivers of Kent

Obscure references
Seems to me like commercial spam- it has 0.01% relevance to the article, it just contains 5 relevant words hidden in text. Better would be http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199899/cmselect/cmenvtra/477/477mem24.htm I am making the switch. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ClemRutter (talk • contribs) 22:14, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

The Swale
Shouldn't there be a mention?--ClemRutter (talk) 09:31, 21 March 2009 (UTC)