Talk:Road House (1989 film)/Archive 1

VfD
On April 14, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep, move, and cleanup. See Votes for deletion/Road House for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 14:43, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Homoeroticism
Someone should address this with an in-depth analysis. No movie where the villain says "I used to fuck guys like you in prison" when he has the protagonist in a headlock from behind can be considered straight. People say Top Gun is gay, but Road House is right up there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rick Rossovich (talk • contribs)


 * First of all, Wikipedia editors are not supposed to write in-depth analyses. They are supposed to write material that summarizes already published information. Second, one scene in which one character says one line that is likely a taunt capitalizing on a social expectation of prison behavior, hardly makes homoeroticism (note the correct spelling) a theme worth discussing in this article. Perhaps the article you are looking for is Prison sexuality. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 22:08, 24 August 2006 (UTC)


 * First off, way to be the stereotypical pompous Wikipedia guy. Maybe if you have actually seen this movie and understand it, you would realize that while I picked one scene there are many other scenes that make the movie homoerotic.  There are plenty of Wikipedia entries on movies that examine themes, social impact, etc., all of which go beyond summaries.  Secondly, I was joking.  If someone seriously wrote an in-depth analysis of homoeroticism in Road House I wouldn't know whether to laugh or cry.  Rick Rossovich 20:38, 25 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Some people watch films like Road House for the moral issues, or the conflict between classes. Some enjoy a good set of barroom brawls. Some see homoeroticism. Some watch them to laugh at the corny dialog. As the saying goes, what one brings to a work of art is an important element in how one views the work. I apologize for missing your joke, but what I bring to talk pages that ask for "analyses" is a tired familiarity with others' desires to turn Wikipedia articles into blogs about their subjects. I'm sorry for getting a bit tchetchy about it. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 23:59, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Folks, I've removed the newly created section on "Homosexual references" because it is original research, which is not allowed. As the discussion above indicates, please do not add material that is not a summary of published analyses from reliable sources. Thank you. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 00:44, 7 March 2007 (UTC)


 * I am going to remove the entire Plot Summary as original research if there are no sources cited by the end of August. Just thought you might like to know.  JimCubb (talk) 03:07, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Recent edits
Just a heads-up, Chet808 did some editing on Land of the Lost (1974 TV series) characters and species that mixed plausible-sounding details with what appeared to be crude sexual humor that wasn't present in the source material. His recent edits here seems similar in style, but I'm not familiar with this movie so I can't fully judge. Would someone who's seen the movie recently or who's otherwise more knowledgeable than I check this please? Bryan Derksen 07:44, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

I'll be happy to defend my edit's of this classic movie. Everything I added happened in the movie. Hell, I even left out some of the more sordid details ("...you gonna be my Saturday night special ?"). Anyone familiar with [Road House] will agree. --Chets808 15:38, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

SWayze is GOD —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.106.55.71 (talk) 10:21, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Needs Cleanup?
No offense to the contributors, but I think the plot summary needs a major reworking. Details are all out of chronological order, and non-neutral comments are scattered throughout. --Enigmatick 20:55, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

I did some of the cleanup and re-worked some of the order as best I can remember. I think the article can do without the unnecessary sexual references, homo or hetero. Kbfixit (talk) 15:46, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Cocaine
Is there any reason to put in this reference to cocaine use, when Occam's Razor provides a far more likely (but equally conjectural) explanation: the scene was re-shot after fake blood had already been applied and cleaned off, and some of the blood had been missed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.148.42.30 (talk) 01:26, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Disappointment
The second paragraph states, "After its initial modest box office reception and mixed reviews from critics, many considered the film a disappointment, especially considering the phenomenal success of Swayze's Dirty Dancing." Why would a movie budgeted for $10 million that grossed $30 million be considered a disappointment? I say we should delete this unless it can be cited to a reliable source. --GHcool (talk) 21:40, 11 March 2008 (UTC)


 * It was considered a disappointment because Dirty Dancing made $60 million on a $6 million dollar budget. 70.234.192.130 (talk) 20:26, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

roadhouse the movie
what was   the year  & model   of  the mercedes   patrick swayze  drove   in  the  movie  road  house   shdetree1  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.73.196.178 (talk) 05:29, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

PhD??
Where does it say he has a doctorate? I remember Lynch and Swayze having a conversation when he was getting stapled, and she said "I see you have a degree from NYU, what is it in?" and he replies "philosophy". This would mean he has a B.A. or B.S, not a doctorate. Msjayhawk (talk) 21:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)