Talk:Roads and freeways in metropolitan Phoenix/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Kurumi and AARoads I do not believe are reliable sources, ref 18-21 are the exact same link, use named references to avoid duplication.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Suggest asking the Maps Task Force for a map for the article, maybe a few more images, because just having US 60 with an image seems odd
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Suggest asking the Maps Task Force for a map for the article, maybe a few more images, because just having US 60 with an image seems odd
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

-- Admrb♉ltz (t • c • [ log]) 04:01, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Failing GA after 6 days of no improvements. -- Admrb♉ltz (t • c • [ log]) 15:49, 26 August 2008 (UTC)