Talk:Roaring Creek (Pennsylvania)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 10:49, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Grabbing for a review shortly. Miyagawa (talk) 10:49, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Ok, let's get this going.


 * Lead: Pipe a link for watershed through to drainage basin
 * Done.


 * Change 3000 to 3,500 - purely because it made me do a double take when you then mention the year 2000 in the same sentence. Same issue with the line under Watershed.
 * Done.


 * Link Quakers, as well as the various things in the sentence beginning "Claystones"
 * Done.


 * Geography: Link topography and headwaters
 * Done.


 * Move the link to limestone to the previous paragraph, as you've currently got the second mention linked
 * Done.


 * I'd merge the last two paragraphs of the section, since one is a single seven word sentence. Just delete the line breaks and it'll be fine.
 * Done.


 * Watershed: I'd merge the second and third paragraphs, since like the last section, there's a single sentence paragraph there.
 * Merged the second with the first instead, seemed to belong better there.


 * History: Could "Their lengths are 64.0 feet (19.5 m) and 46.9 feet (14.3 m) and the first was repaired in 2011." be re-written to avoid the two "and"s?
 * Done.


 * Cite #3: You've got the publisher in the author section.
 * It was actually written by an organization, not an individual person, as is the case with a lot of those kinds of documents.


 * Other cites - you see to be missing publisher details on a few. You've got the author and the title, but no publisher.
 * Done.

I think that's everything. Placing on hold for seven days. Miyagawa (talk) 21:29, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
 * That should be everything now. --Jakob (talk)  aka Jakec  18:05, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Great, happy to promote to GA on that basis. Miyagawa (talk) 19:00, 18 August 2016 (UTC)