Talk:Robby Mook/Archives/2018

Untitled
Jim Messina (Obama 2012) was an openly gay campaign manager. I don't think Mook is the first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.231.249.141 (talk) 19:36, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

--> This is correct, Jim Messina is the first openly gay campaign manager of a presidential race. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.200.136.251 (talk) 18:37, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

What is the significance of this photo?
Instaurare (talk) 06:16, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Hacking.
Doesn't take much to hack into a DNC, they are as leaky as a sieve, any U.S. kid with an allready preplaced packet can do so. Why the haste to point to Russia, Europe or any number of Nations that disagree with you?

PS> Hillary's campaign is in violation of several sections of code, including that code that must be placed to remove an individual from a mailing list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.92.247.102 (talk) 13:37, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Can we get a recent picture of Robby Mook?
As my subject heading states. Could someone place a recent picture of Robby Mook? The current image is well before he would have qualified for a wikipedia page at all. I'm not always the best at putting the pictures up, so I hope someone else can get one up there. Vcczar (talk) 16:47, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
 * OK, I will try. Geraldshields11 (talk) 21:37, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

Has he appeared anywhere since election night?
I am unaware of any sightings, if so. --Artaxerxes 23:49, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Why would we have seen him? What does it matter that we haven't? He's not a celebrity who usually goes where the paparazzi are. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:50, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

I'll take that as a 'no'. And John Podesta? Disappeared from the radar, too? Very important figures in a U.S. presidential campaign, whether seen as poltical celebrities or not. What does their disappearance mean? What do such important figures owe us, the public, after such a political contest in which they played such a large part? Their reflections, explanations, expressions of acceptance, calming words, apologies, etc.? --Artaxerxes 16:41, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Unless it is commented on in the sources, that really isn't relevant to Wikipedia and would be original research. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:44, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Apparently he spoke at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government yesterday. Unfortunately, it's not been uploaded on their youtube channel yet.Zigzig20s (talk) 04:08, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Picture
User:Ravensfan2000: Please don't remove his picture again. It may be old, but it's as good as it gets unless/until someone uploads another picture on Wikimedia Commons. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 18:24, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Ran HRC's failed campaign
User:TonyBallioni and I seem to agree that we should include in the lede the fact that the Mook-led HRC campaign lost to Donald Trump. Yet a series of accounts with very low editing counts (namely this and this) keep trying to delete it. I should note that one of these accounts, User:Ravensfan2000, uploaded the new picture of Robby Mook, which could suggest a close connection. Please stop. The entire world knows that HRC lost; this article is not an advertisement for Mook. This is an encyclopedia.Zigzig20s (talk) 19:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I reverted because the edit summary "typo"suggested to me it was a POV vandal. I do like your phrasing of "failed" better than what I restored, however. Concision is key. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:30, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
 * pinging you because this article is US politics related and has been having content removal issues. I know you've dealt with US politics issues in the past, so your thoughts on whether this needs semi-pp or DS would be helpful. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:04, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * "Failed" is a loaded word. I changed it to "unsuccessful". – Muboshgu (talk) 16:16, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Works by me. I wouldn't call failed loaded, but I agree unsuccessful is more neutral. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:27, 31 March 2017 (UTC)