Talk:Robert 'Dolly' Dunn

Inconsistency in narrative
This person was found in Honduras but US Secretary of State Albright authorized extradition. Honduras is a separate country, the US Secretary of State has no authority there. The statement as written cannot be true.

Links to sources:

http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,23250804-5001021,00.html

http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,23251992-5001021,00.html

http://www.thewest.com.au/aapstory.aspx?StoryName=461543

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200412/s1269619.htm

Quite a bit of detail on how Dunn bribed police, fled to Honduras and was tracked down by Sixty Minutes.

http://www.miaminewtimes.com/1997-12-04/news/sherlock-holmes-meet-melanie-morningstar/

The Central American country has no extradition treaty with either Australia or the United States, so Honduran immigration authorities took a different tack. They decided to detain Dunn and then expel him as an "undesirable person." Because many international flights out of Tegucigalpa land in Miami as either a destination or connecting point, it made sense for Dunn to be sent to the United States, which does have an extradition treaty with Australia. The only possible problem: Honduran immigration officers by law couldn't hold Dunn longer than 24 hours, so they had to time their arrest in a way that would ensure he was promptly put on a plane to Miami. Qwy47 (talk) 23:34, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

I was just going to ask about this, but seems the question has been already answered. But to the point, maybe we should change that one sentence? I mean it does sound confusing to begin with. Norum (talk) 10:36, 11 July 2009 (UTC)