Talk:Robert Bacher/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Gilderien (talk · contribs) 14:52, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

First look - well written, couple of minor concerns;

-- Gilderien Chat&#124;List of good deeds 15:01, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Please DAB Luis Alvarez, and James Conant.
 * Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:10, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Could you confirm that in your writing style the citations at the end of a paragraph will cover all of the material therein?
 * Yes. Each footnote covers the text back to the previous footnote, or the start of the paragraph, whichever comes first.
 * "As luck would have it" - tone seems slightly too informal for an encyclopædia, could you re-word it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gilderien (talk • contribs) 20:21, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:40, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality: Yes, very -
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources: Well, (almost) all offline but seems reliable -
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: All images appear to be in the public domain -
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:


 * Pass or Fail:

A very good article, and easily the fastest I have passed a GA.-- Gilderien Chat&#124;List of good deeds 20:43, 21 April 2013 (UTC)