Talk:Robert Boulter/GA2

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

'''Starts GA Reassessment. The reassessmment will follow the same sections of the Article.''' --Whiteguru (talk) 06:35, 16 May 2021 (UTC) Instructions: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment Result: Delisted. Legitimate concerns, no opposition or improvements made --Whiteguru (talk) 05:28, 25 May 2021 (UTC) 

Observations

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Reference 1 is primary, and cites two Wikipedia pages. Neither reference Robert Boulter.
 * Reference 2 is a mention, not really a reliable source.
 * Reference 3 goes to the Wikipedia page for the defunct Independent on Sunday
 * Reference 4 goes to the Wikipedia page for The Herald (Glasgow)
 * Reference 5 goes to the Wikipedia page for Evening Standard
 * Reference 6 goes to the Wikipedia page for Judge John Deed
 * Ditto Reference 7,8,9,10. All go to Wikipedia pages and not sources.
 * Reference 11 is a dead link
 * Reference 14 is a dead link
 * References 15,16,17 all go to Wikipedia pages and not the source.
 * Reference 22 is a 404, reference 23 goes to the Wikipedia page for Doctors.
 * Reference 25 is likely a permanent dead link
 * Reference 27 goes to the Wikipedia page for Daylight Robbery (2008 film)
 * References 32, 33 go to the Wikipedia page for Waking the Dead.
 * Ditto References 34,35


 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * This article suffers from WP:PROSELINE - he starred in this, he performed that role here, this role there.
 * There is no significant notability here except for a claim to fame as a (trial) stand-in for a young Luke Skywalker in The Force Awakens.


 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Given the number of links to roles played by this actor without proper references, this page appears to be WP:FANCRUFT


 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Page created 11 October 2012
 * 62 edits to this page by 36 editors in that time.
 * Page achieved GA status on 13 July 2013
 * Page creator is blocked for sockpuppetry, 26 November 2020
 * There are no other significant editors except bots and page checkers.
 * may need reassessment was added on 27 April 2021;


 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Page is not illustrated with any images. It has tables of acting roles.


 * 1) Overall:
 * There are a lot of problems with references on this page. Using Wikipedia as a source. WP:NOTSOURCE applies.
 * Repair of sources will be needed to keep Good Article status.      --Whiteguru (talk) 12:10, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Delisted as Good Article
 * Legitimate concerns raised above were not addressed. Should editors seek another reassessment, the issues raised above need to be addressed first before a reassessment can be commenced. --Whiteguru (talk) 05:28, 25 May 2021 (UTC)