Talk:Robert Campeau

Article needs attention
Maybe start by removing unsourced material? I also just removed an unsourced comment from this page. Just a thought.--Tom 22:22, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
 * wouldn't it be better to find sources for the the material? -Dhodges (talk) 22:33, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, that would be better, but until that happens, unsourced material should be removed, imho of course. --Tom 00:04, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Per WP:BLP, which is policy, I have removed the objectionable content. If it can be sourced adequately and presented in a neutral fashion, there is no problem with adding it back in later. Skomorokh 17:04, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

I've just looked at the two sets of IP addresses whence this content is originating, and figured this out. These edits are coming from Austria and Germany, where M. Campeau's ex-wife lives. It seems, given the close resemblance of the article wording to what is on her own WWW site and the fact that the content links to that site, that this is Campeau's ex-wife abusing Wikipedia as a platform to make actionable accusations against her ex-husband, his attorney, and his attorney's husband that fall highly foul of our Verifiability, Neutrality, Wikipedia is not a soapbox, and Biography of living persons policies. Wikipedia is not a platform for trying to fight lawsuits with one's ex-husband. Since the IP addresses are dynamically assigned, and since this has been going on month after month since at least 2006 (sic!), according to the edit history, I've semi-protected this article for 1 year. Uncle G (talk) 04:59, 17 September 2009 (UTC)