Talk:Robert Doornbos

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:48, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 one external links on Robert Doornbos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070326232446/http://www.nu.nl:80/news/803063/47/Doornbos_gaat_met_326_km_u_over_de_Afsluitdijk_%28video%29.html to http://www.nu.nl/news/803063/47/Doornbos_gaat_met_326_km_u_over_de_Afsluitdijk_(video).html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090807025850/http://www.robertdoornbos.com:80/news.asp?id=581 to http://www.robertdoornbos.com/news.asp?id=581
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071010053829/http://www.f1db.com/f1/page/Robert_Doornbos to http://www.f1db.com/f1/page/Robert_Doornbos

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 20:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Monaco nationality?
Does anyone know what the deal is with Doornbos being counted as a Monaco national for the 2005 F1 season? I see it's referenced to the F1 website, but I can't see any reference to it anywhere else on the web. He was definitely counted as Dutch at the time. Any idea what's going on? WilliamF1two (talk) 11:51, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
 * See this discussion. DH85868993 (talk) 22:15, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

ViaPlay
@SSSB What is the need of mentioned he is not part of ViaPlay? I don't understand why you need a complete paragraph to mention he is not part of something. This page is about Doornbos and after racing he is analist for Ziggo(also this for this year).Lobo151 (talk) 07:06, 20 March 2022 (UTC)


 * You should have put that in your summary then. Reading you summary, combined with the text you removed, it looked to me like you'd misread the text - that's why I reverted it. If you'd put in your summary, what you put in that comment, I would not have reverted your edit. SSSB (talk) 10:08, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Understood, I shall be more clear in the summary next time. Sorry for the inconveniences caused.Lobo151 (talk) 11:27, 20 March 2022 (UTC)