Talk:Robert Hoyzer

Untitled
If this is a case of copyright violation, it's The Peninsula violating Wikipedia's copyright. The Peninsula published its article on December 26, 2005. This Wikipedia article is much older and it seems that its content was copied by The Peninsula. -- Robert Weemeyer 05:38, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

copyright
If there is suspision that a newspaper etc. has copied articles (complete) from wikipedia shouldn't wikipedia investigate the case. Even though there is no real copyright on wikipedia, there is the simple curtesy that one puts a work cited on papers, etc. in which one cited wikipedia. I think that Wikipedia should be getting an excuse from the Peninsula and to be quite frankly speaking I have found at least one other article that the Peninsula has stolen from another page.

(Great Job of writing own Artilces on the Peninsulas side and why doesn't wikipedia stand up for its right?)

Krazygermanbuddy 03:47, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Too true. There is a local newspaper reporter here named L.P. who seems to have a preference for copying Wikipedia paragraphs as opposed to taking the trouble to write original content.

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 03:50, 28 August 2007 (UTC)