Talk:Robert Hues/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

This article clearly meets the GA criteria, and I am going to pass it. I do have a couple of suggestions that I believe would improve the article, but I see them as ways to make a good article better, not as ways to make a bad article good. Here are my suggestions:


 * 1) The article describes Hues's major work in great detail, but it doesn't clarify whether this work had any influence on other people. Presumably it did, because of the number of times it was republished.  It would be nice to say something about this in the lead if possible.
 * 2) I'm not convinced that the long list of printings and versions of his book adds enough value to the article to justify the space it takes up. Looie496 (talk) 19:05, 14 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi, thanks very much. Haven't come across any sources mentioning Hues' influence on other people, unfortunately. Will update the article if I find additional information. — Cheers, Jack Lee  –talk– 16:08, 15 December 2008 (UTC)