Talk:Robert K. A. Gardiner/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Guettarda (talk · contribs) 14:50, 23 March 2019 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

This is really nice work. You handled the conflicting and incomplete sources well. It's an important article in an area where Wikipedia's coverage could stand to be a lot better. My only suggestion would be this sentence: His father died when he was two years old, and one of his siblings also died. It just feels too dry - maybe something like "and one of his siblings died before adulthood". But that's far too minor an issue to stop promotion. Guettarda (talk) 15:40, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review. I have implemented the recommended change. -Indy beetle (talk) 19:52, 23 March 2019 (UTC)