Talk:Robert Muldoon

Neutral point of view and unreliability of sources
This article contains multiple unsourced and dubious claims, or claims that are not verified by the sources cited.

There are examples of opinion pieces critical of Muldoon being cited as fact in this article, rather than being quoted as someone's opinion.

There are also multiple examples of non-neutral language in this article. Examples include describing Muldoon as "uncouth" or "abrasive" without an accompanying source or providing attribution to the sources of such opinions. Radiatia (talk) 15:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The claims that aren't cited at all should be removed. From what I can see the other statements of opinions are recorded as such. --LJ Holden 12:14, 20 May 2024 (UTC)