Talk:Robert Nimmo/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 22:05, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Picking this one up. Review to follow. Hawkeye7  (discuss)  22:05, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Lead
 * "4th Australian Base Area" should be "4th Base Sub Area"
 * Could we have his service number in the infobox? It was QX23797
 * Remove the hard-coded image size from the infobox

World War I
 * I don't see the need to put "A" Squadron in quotation marks.
 * typo: "the trenches douth"
 * "spurline" should be "spur". Could be linked to ridge?

Interwar period
 * Link Federal Capital Territory, Melbourne

World War II
 * "4th Base Sub-Area" should be "4th Base Sub Area"

United Nations service and death
 * Link gun salute

Duplicate links


 * Queensland, colonel, second-in-command

References
 * Londrey (2021) is giving me a Delete the ref from the template, as it is already the default.

All looks very good. Just some minor points. Hawkeye7  (discuss)  22:57, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 * All done, thanks . BTW, warm congrats on your election as lead coord! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:04, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I've never been the lead coordinator before. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  04:54, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Great article.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Great article.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Great article.
 * Great article.