Talk:Robert Peverell Hichens/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Magic ♪piano 14:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

Overall a nice read. You need to work on your grammar a bit -- I fixed a number of run-on sentences and other grammatical irregularities. I've noted above that a few of the images have descriptions saying they are PD, but also contain a non-free image rationale. This is something that ought to be fixed (also, you should probably use the Information template to capture the origin of the picture), but I don't think it's something to hold up passing the GA. Congratulations!  Magic ♪piano 15:49, 4 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks changed the images to the inf template. --Jim Sweeney (talk) 13:33, 5 January 2010 (UTC)