Talk:Robert Q. Marston/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

The article looks pretty good, except for some minor stuff that I changed, such as the number of columns in the references section. I'd pass the article, but I'm curious: is it at all possible to expand the Early life and education or Legacy sections? If so, it would be best to do so. If not, then this review is pretty short.


 * Some points worth mentioning:


 * The lede should either be all-referenced, or without references at all.
 * ✅ References have been moved to body text from lede.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:25, 13 February 2010 (UTC)


 * The image of Martson should be cropped to remove the caption and whitespace at the bottom. I can probably do this in a short while.
 * Thank you. I did not know how to manipulate the photo cropping.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:25, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I did not know how to manipulate the photo cropping.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:25, 13 February 2010 (UTC)


 * As I said above, expansion of the two shorter sections would be nice if possible.
 * ✅ I have included a summary sentence at the beginning of the "legacy" section.  Unfortunately, I have used all of the material I can find regarding Marston's early life and education.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:25, 13 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Ref. 5 points to a source that details Martson's role in desegregating the Medical Center. Instead of pointing the reader to a separate source, can you include that further information within the article?
 * ✅ Per your suggestion, I have expanded the Ole Miss desegregation section with additional details and expanded footnotes. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:25, 13 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Moving the second image over to the left or up slightly might remove the squishing of the of the two sections. Purely aesthetics.
 * ✅ Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:25, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

If those can be fixed or I'm in error, then the article is an easy pass. Congrats, and thanks for an interesting article. Reviewer: Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 03:29, 9 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you, sir, for your thoughtful critique and insights. Hopefully, I have addressed your concerns and suggestions.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:25, 13 February 2010 (UTC)


 * You have. Thanks, and congratulations on the GA. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 20:57, 13 February 2010 (UTC)