Talk:Robert Rosenkranz

Deletion?
1) Robert Rosenkranz is a public personality and the information posted on this page is public knowledge, not private, and is not protected by copyright.

2) I have been authorized by Mr. Rosenkranz to post this information about him.

3) Further information about his his philanthropic endeavors and the work of his organinzation is forthcoming.

I see no reason for this to be deleted for copyright violation. If you disagree, please explain your reason.

Weisergroup 15:18, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Yes, but the reason this has been marked for deletion is because it has 1 sentence on someone who doesn't seem at all notable, not because of copyright infringement. Crowstar Vaseline-on-the-lens-Jitsu!fwends! 15:20, 31 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Incorrect. The tag was added explicitly because of alleged copyright infringement, although no url was given.  This is a clear case of mistaken tagging.  And notability is clearly asserted.  Besides being CEO of a prominent corporation, someone commonly referred to as philanthropist is someone well known for philanthropy (plenty of Google hits attest to Rosenkranz's philanthropic notability).  To Weisergroup, 2) worries me somewhat.  Please read WP:COI to avoid any problems.


 * I removed the speedy tag the first time since it clearly was wrong. Adding the hangon tag only put it back as   a (contested) speedy, so I will remove it.  But please add more info nonetheless.

Talk Page Mess
This page should have headings. I will add them. And who isn't signing their posts... :| Separately I think the Mu Xin link is broken I believe it should be directed to the 20th c. artist and writer. However he doesn't appear to have a wikipedia page. Thirdly I agree their are major COI problems I am going to mark it with come cleanup/deletion tags. Adrianturcato (talk) 20:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

I agree, huge COI problems, it reads as if entirely written by his PR, as the PR has admitted above. I tidied it up as 92.8.99.205 (I can't access my old account so started new YalieEditor one), removing over 'fluff' and also trying to add more hard facts based on a quick look through Newspaper web sites. In business the man has made a lot of money, so must have talent in that area, but he seems to be trying to be notable for "Philanthropy" in a way that does not quite check out - ie his exhibition of photographs lasted one night, he funds his wife's exhibitions at the Guggenheim etc YalieEditor (talk) 19:37, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Comments
Mr. Rosenkranz has received international press coverage on his most recent affair. This is clearly important news in his profile that is currently ignored by Wikipedia.

Cheque mate: How extra-marital affair came back to bite millionaire CEO Robert Rosenkranz http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/cheque-mate-how-extra-marital-affair-came-back-to-bite-millionaire-ceo-robert-rosenkranz/story-fnixwvgh-1227221880708

Wall Street mistresses are winning the internet age http://www.businessinsider.com/wall-street-mistresses-and-the-internet-2015-2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.171.130.168 (talk • contribs)