Talk:Robert S. Siegler

Untitled
I'm reverting this reversion because the original edit did not violate any policies. The information is based on public records and presents facts impartially. A person's political donations affect the public as much as what church attend to or their other philanthropic causes. It sounds like you're saying we can only include information a notable person's publicist would approve of. This is an encyclopedia, not a hagiography. People have a right to support candidates of their choice but the public also has a right to know about this. WikiDan61 is abusing the Neutral POV policy to engage in censorship.Iblismesdara (talk) 04:48, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
 * In order to apply this policy neutrally, we would need to include the political donation history of every biographical subject at Wikipedia. Again, I point out that a person's political activity, whether or not a matter of public record, should only become part of their Wikipedia biography if the person is noted as a political entity, if they have made specific public statements regarding their political views. Further, the fact that you are singling out Trump supporters argues that your motives are not neutral. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 11:21, 26 August 2019 (UTC)