Talk:Robert Simmon

Untitled
First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way?
 * I liked that you went into depth about one of Simmon's big achievements (Blue Marble). I thought you did a really great job explaining this concept. In your intro paragraph on Robert Simmon's, you include a lot of detail, which was also really nice.

What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement?
 * I think maybe split up and add more sections to include his Education, Career, and Publications, in order to give a better understanding of who Robert Simmon's was and to organize your information better.

What’s the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
 * Adding more headlines to organize the content that you provide.

Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know!
 * I really like how you bolded something important that Simmon's contributed to and that you went into depth on this subject. I think that's something I need to add into my Wikipedia site that would make it more interesting.

Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Great job!.

Sam-2727 (talk) 21:50, 16 June 2020 (UTC)